If you don’t hate niggers, you are not human.

i doubt anyone in this group is claiming to be patriotic dude.

Smash Heaven wrote:

fixed

If you don’t hate murderous commie dictators you aren’t an anarchist either. Also, you’re an asshole as well.

Chairman Nao wrote:
If you don’t hate murderous commie dictators you aren’t an anarchist either. Also, you’re an asshole as well.

when it comes down to it, the so-called leftists, like you, don’t really support resistance movements in the third world. for that reason, you don’t oppose US imperialism either.

in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

Smash Heaven wrote:
in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:

in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

it’s not a false dichotomy, it’s a real dichotomy. case in point, you don’t support the nationalist resistance, therefore you don’t oppose the imperialist murderers.

Smash Heaven wrote:

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:


in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

it’s not a false dichotomy, it’s a real dichotomy. case in point, you don’t support the nationalist resistance, therefore you don’t oppose the imperialist murderers.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:



in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

it’s not a false dichotomy, it’s a real dichotomy. case in point, you don’t support the nationalist resistance, therefore you don’t oppose the imperialist murderers.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

dude you already said that shit. whatever, talking to you is like talking to brick wall. you’re hopeless, like many other so-called "anarchists".

I’ve always disliked the term "support." It makes for such a useful propagandistic term, no matter which group of people is using it. What makes that word such a great propaganda tool, is its inherent vaguenes, and the fact that the person who is using that term, can utilitze the argumenative flaw of equivocation, to select which meaning they want, and then not apply that consistently.

"Support our troops" being one of the most notably meaningless, ’feel-good’ propagandistic phrases, which has become common in recent years.

Support? In what way? What does this mean? What actions, if any, must apply in order for the criteria applying to the definition be fulfilled? Or is a mere thought enough to claim you support something [an arguable absurdity]? How much of an action or effort is reasonably required to genuinely say, without being disingenuous, that one actually took on a supportive role being paying mere lip service to the cause.

The dictionary does a pretty piss poor job of defining what criteria are necessary, so that’s no use, as the dictionary definition (as is so often the case), relies on a self referential definition which simply references the very word it seeks to define.





As a random aside, atheists are often guilty of utilizing equivocation when they selectively employ different means of the word "belief", such that they apply a different meaning of belief for religious people, than they do for themselves.

Smash Heaven wrote:

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:

Chairman Nao wrote:

Smash Heaven wrote:




in other words. the communist regimes of the past were not perfect BUT they are worthy of defending against imperialist propaganda.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

it’s not a false dichotomy, it’s a real dichotomy. case in point, you don’t support the nationalist resistance, therefore you don’t oppose the imperialist murderers.

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

dude you already said that shit. whatever, talking to you is like talking to brick wall. you’re hopeless, like many other so-called "anarchists".

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

Chairman Nao wrote:
I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

I’m not buying into your double-false dichotomy, prick.

Juraj Gagne - Ozymandias wrote:

Chairman Nao wrote:

I’m not buying into your false dichotomy. I don’t have to support either.

I’m not buying into your double-false dichotomy, prick.

Please clarify.