wich one is better, me personally i think dookie kiks ass

Alex the Ladies Man wrote:
wich one is better, me personally i think dookie kiks ass

Dookie changed the direction of rock music in the 90's. It gets my vote hands-down

I actually really love nimrod

(even though dookie was a higher grossing cd)

those happen to be the only two i have at this point and I personally think nimrod. was better. I just think the songs were more original from each other than on Dookie so it makes it funner to listen to.

nimrod takes the cake......and eats it too...












who ever said you cant have for cake and eat it too is a wrong fool. cause nimrod did that.

I really like both but I guess if I had to pick it would be Nimrod.

Well, Nimrod was the first cd that I bought with my own money, so it'll always be my favorite.

♦♦J±Rose♦&diams wrote:
Well, Nimrod was the first cd that I bought with my own money, so it'll always be my favorite.

same here, only first green day not first ever.

warning really tops all, but i have to say between the two, dookie

both are incredible albums, but i would have to say nimrod was my favorite of the two.

Man thats a hard decision but i would have to say Nimrod

yeah...I'm not completly sure what to say to that question...I think nimrod tho...sounds a bit more...idk...but its a bit more of whatever i'm trying to say then dookie.

Although Dookie is a great cd and always will be I would have to pick Nimrod.

dookie is more of a fun lovin punk album than nimrod (though it is still punk) 39/smooth, kerplunk!, and dookie were their most punk ones i think.

hands down dookie is better. when they released slappy hours and kerplunk they were virtually unknown. when they released dookie the band basically exploded into the business and if they havent released dookie they wouldnt be anywhere as big as they are today. not only that i love he hell out of that album. its my favorite