Post a reply to this Topic » Profile » Topics » Countdown w/ Olbermann and politics of Marriage via Sanford

Author Message
Nexus Hexus

M/33
Lehighton,
Pennsylvania
Instant Message
Send Message
Reply with this quote Reply to this Post Posted:  Jul 1, 2009 7:28 AM
Being a moderately dedicated fan of Countdown/Olbermann, I take no joy in delivering this blog.. However for Keith to take an entire special comment (2008) to scold the recinded rights of marriage over Proposition 8 was a meritable moment for his show. Today, Keiths’ merit seemed to pair with the rather recent address of Dana Milbank "being better than the journalism he was producing" on ’best persons.’

Governor Sanford is not to be envied, Keith. He’s not even to be quoted , positively. Perhaps one day he’ll release his book of poetry and sonnets to his past mistresses.. but until that day.. Mark Sanford is no icon of the very vows he claims to be engaged within. Let the single folk enable you to smile and applaud the words of intimacy and passion... theres a marriage vow thats so politicized.. ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LIGHTLY OR ACCEPTED THAT SANFORD SHOULD SNEAK AWAY FROM HIS ’LEADING BY EXAMPLE’. Now its time he fall by example , as with other politicians who have affairs.. No more marriage for them. If the state and the federal government has and does restrict marriage, it ought to get about to restricting it on those who presently ALSO don’t conform to the very vows restricting ALL citizens from the same rights. This Supreme Court has been cowardly in aggressing whom of heterosexuals are also not licensable.. to wed. ANd the Supreme court has dodged the obligation to negate the cost of marriage licenses .. for no state , nor congress can obligate policy to merely one holy bible of the Christio-Judaeic faith. This countries policy has been lazy; A welfare queen of the heretic and the nutcase evangelical ... any two bit politician who waves a bible and is accepted to recreate Christianity so long as Jesus appears at least once in the context of thanking ’god ’ for a booty slam in the back offices of the board-room.

When repairing a CHristian marriage ( allegedly thats the grading scale)...Sanford asking to join his mistress was hardly a sign of voluntary effort. Theres a christian precident of unfaithfulness that the co-senators of the republican party aren’t addressing .. " Is this not the party of their god"? The argentinian mistress is no less a scoundrel for her own infidelity; guessing her to be both Latina and Roman Catholic. Keith , if you take your special comments with the deepest sincere quest to improve the planet.. at least be aware when the idealism and the sensationalism of news do cross paths.. because envying

Gov. Sanfords’ clever words of swooning is still ’his own personal demon".. all of his own authoring. Is adultery illegal in Argentina? what would that type of activity educate his four sons other than marriage vows are a tax benefit to be broken casually. He seems to be fooling you, Keith, with the charms of passion when it is only legally granted to his wife. The problem with the coverage of this story so far is that MSNBC and most news operations in the States really haven’t taken a close look at the adultery of the mistress also.Equal errant;

She’s no token furniture thats picked up on business trips like purchases at the main Ikea store in sweden. She also is an adulterer. There’s no soul mates here; clearly either the restrictions of marriage that keep gays from benefits should also be enacted upon a lazy heterosexual public who break their vows frequently, or the ’party of god", has watched their deity die now that man ( human ) , is clearly not monogamous at all.. but polyamorous just like the rest of the mammals... season to season. There’s no forgiveness here; there’s no ’oops". If marriage is political ,chumps like Lindsey Graham need to call for Sanfords complete embarassment and censure; not this spineless empathy for a ’sick man’ saving face for the party. Apparently dr.’s these days can actually detain you from sex for health reasons.. ’sick man ’ doesn’t seem to apply to Sanford , or Clinton, or Ensign, Vitter, Spitzer, Patterson, Craig.......... The common excuse is.. "men have always done this, rampant in politics".. well, Is this your ideals or just what you think your god forgives you for? Why get married at all?

Post a reply to this Topic

dspPostReplies v29